🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."